A brief digression. For those of you who were well entrenched in dinosaur lore around the time the original Jurassic Park came out you should recall how that movie took a bastardized version of Velociraptor, beefed it up for scares (strangely prescient considering Utahraptor was discovered concurrently), and performed a marketing coup de grace and simply abbreviated Velociraptor to "raptor" for public consumption. Never mind the fact that "raptor" already served as a common name referring to birds of prey.
What has become increasingly clear is that in the intervening years since Jurassic Park the Mesozoic version of "raptor" has increasingly merged with the Cenozoic version of raptor in appearance, behavior, and ecology. The term "land hawk" is an apt description for sickle-clawed theropods as it encapsulates their feathered appearance, likely solitary tactic of prey wing mantling/grappling with foot claws, and likely penchant for small and medium sized prey and carrion. As has been well noted the film franchise has not kept pace with these discoveries... So you would think that "raptor" dinosaurs - as they are now construed - would make great paleoart fodder for dynamic intra or inter-species disputes just like modern fully avian raptors.
Sadly I was a little disappointed...
I want to break down the pics I saw into a couple of different genres so if you go do the google search yourself you will see most fall into these groups. So without further adieu let's get to the pics!!
And in order of accuracy....
1) MOST ACCURATE. Actual, you know, fighting raptors!!
credit Lyle Madison CDFW photo of the year |
In this case a red-tailed hawk attempting to pilfer a freshly caught fish - called a "hitch" - from an osprey. You know I love fish eating theropods and kleptoparasitism and I would wager such behaviors went all the way back into the Triassic in theropods.
2) LESS ACCURATE. Disappointing Mesozoic "raptors". Ouch, painful to look at. A few ok deviantart pics but nothing that really blows you away.
But really there is not much fight in this team given their early departure from the playoffs this year so not really too many photos of the Toronto Raptors fighting (and even here it is a struggle for the ball not a real fight worthy of the name "raptor").
4) OK A BIT OF A STRETCH BUT... the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor attacks from above, is weaponized, uses stealth, and has aerial maneuverability.
5) AND THE WORST OF ALL...
...
...
...
...
...
......
.......
.........
............
...............
...................
........................
.............................
It's awful. No feathers. Pronated hands. Why are they not attacking each other? Better yet why are they not attacking that dumb synapsid offering up it's arms as chew toys? Why would such a disparate lineage even read human/primate/mammalian body language, eye contact, tone of voice, and facial expression with any kind of relative understanding?
There you have it Jurassic World raptors still less realistic than raptor jets, raptor basketball players, outdated raptor art, and raptor birds of prey.
Support me on Patreon.
Like antediluvian salad on facebook.
Watch me on Deviantart @NashD1.Subscribe to my youtube channel Duane Nash.
My other blog southlandbeaver.blogspot.
While I always appreciate mocking Jurassic World, I have to object that with practise and mutual training, humans and dinosaurs are quite capable of understading each others body language. Or so my experience so far on training living dinosaurs of the order Psittaciformes seems to imply.
ReplyDeleteGood point planeetanihmeet!! I though someone would bring up parrots. Chris Pratt can take his chances!!
ReplyDeleteDuane Nash: "The term "land hawk" is an apt description for sickle-clawed theropods as it encapsulates their feathered appearance, likely solitary tactic of prey wing mantling/grappling with foot claws, and likely penchant for small and medium sized prey and carrion."
ReplyDeleteActually, "highly developed cooperative hunting may be important for many raptors" ( http://www.jstor.org/stable/1312102?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents ). Also, in Fowler et al. 2012, it's stated that 1) "Prey-riding can be considered as an extension of the typical accipitrid predatory strategy for dealing with large prey", & 2) "Prey-riding in eagles is a similar behaviour to the “climbing crampon” hypothesis of Manning et al." (which is "a function that would seemingly support group hunting. In such a scenario, some members of the group pulled the victim to the ground, one or more then delivering the killing bite/slash to the throat or belly once exposed (a similar method of predation is hypothesized for sabercats, see McHenry, et al. 2007)": http://www.wired.com/2007/10/at-long-last-dromeosaur-tracks/ ). I'm guessing that prey-riding alone only works for volant animals, hence why eudromaeosaurs & "sabercats" probably did prey-riding in packs. My only other nit-pick is that there aren't more pics.