|(c) Heinrich Mallison. read here|
The pic above depicts a veritable "feeding frenzy" of piscivorous birds during feeding time at the Berlin Zoo. It highlights some of the variety of forms fish eating birds assume today- diving pursuit predators like cormorants, stalking waders like herons, surface gleaners like gulls- to name a few. One does not have to go far to find fish eating birds. Even here in southern California, an area not known for its water resources, I know of a colony of black crowned night herons within walking distance, have spotted an osprey that visits local golf ponds, and can generally find great blue herons stalking any type of habitat- from roadside ditches and vacant lots to backyard gold fish ponds. And that is not even counting ocean birds. Within ten minutes of time spent at the local Santa Clara river mouth I can spot up to two types of terns, brown pelicans, cormorants, several types of gulls, and any number of rarer, migratory types. Clearly with this type of diversity in a relatively urban setting fish eating as a lifestyle for derived avian theropods (i.e. "birds") seems to be working out splendidly. And this modern success of theropods as fish eaters hints at an extended legacy of unbroken success as predators of aquatic life that dates back at least until the Triassic, and quite possibly to the dawn of dinosaurs. And it is this ability to exploit aquatic prey (especially as a "fallback resource"), I will argue, that allowed nonavian theropods to maintain relatively inflated numbers compared to herbivorous dinosaurs- above and beyond the predator prey ratios we see with modern mammals.
First let us look at the general theropod bauplan conserved throughout the Mesozoic. You have a head out in front of everything, even the forearms. The neck in some species is long and "swan like" but stouter in others- but in all species it is relatively mobile and active in thrusting the jaws towards prey. Then you have a relatively long torso and two upright "birdy" legs which can, combined with the neck, allow significant rise over prey. Lastly you have the tail, recently illuminated as not only a balance organ- but a propulsive one as well due to the import of the caudofemoralis muscles. And that is the general shape of a predatory theropod dinosaur- in a sense once you have seen one, you have seen them all. And based on that simple description you might come up with something looking like this:
|Yeah, I know hands are pronated blah- done in about 1998 (c) Duane Nash|
Coelophysis, one of the earliest known theropods from good remains- but also one that effectively sets in stone the basic blueprint from which all future theropods will be based upon- from Torvosaurus to T-Rex. The Coelophysis body plan, minus long torso and tail, was again co-opted and put to use with startling efficacy by predatory wading birds- herons.
|Notice the Heron separates a pair of mating frogs- who says feathered dinos are weak?|
Again notice how it is the combination of the mobile long neck combined with the upright bipedal stance that are the crucial elements of the herons' predatory strike- both of which were there right from the beginning with Coelophysis. Which leads me to a very important point, ALL predatory non-avian theropods were, on account of the conservative theropod bauplan, somewhat pre-adapted to a style of hunting conducive to heron style fish capture. Perhaps, not as good as a heron, but certainly better than something like a wolf- which despite minimal fish catching adaptations- does make a go at salmon quite commonly in some populations.
Shall we go look at the fossil data to see if any of this stuff is supported...
Starting in the Triassic things were a little "tight" ecologically speaking for predaceous dinos. Of course you have a whole variety of prey items in the form of diverse and weird therapsids, reptiles, archosaurs, protodinosaur etc etc. But theropods were essentially "hemmed in" ecologically speaking by phytosaurs, big croc analogues in the waters, and on land rauisuchids, big knarly, macropredatory crurotarsian archosaurs. Although various theropods were diversifying and in some areas becoming quite common, rauisuchids had the megapredatory niche on lock down and were not giving an inch to theropods- which did not get above lion sized for the most part. Fasolasuchus tenax was the T-rex of the rauisuchids from the latest Triassic of Argentina. This 10 meter long beast was, at the time, the largest terrestrial predator the world had seen and held sway over a transitional fauna (Los Colorados Formation) which contained at least 3 prosauropod species. This neglected species was, in a sense, the first brontophagist.
To say world ecosystems experienced a "hiccup" ecologically speaking at the Triassic/Jurassic boundary is putting it mildly- whatever the case phytosaurs and rauisuchids were gone so party times for theropods right? Well a growing body of evidence is suggesting all groups were impoverished, including dinos, after the extinction. Here is a link to a bunch of abstracts from a conference detailing the poorly recorded transition from the Triassic to the Jurassic. Now I don't want to get bogged down in the minutiae from all these abstracts but here are some of the main points. 1) Diversity levels were low and ecosystems not particularly robust at the transition period. 2) Theropods, terrestrial crocs and pterosaurs were ubiquitous and sometimes common, herbivorous dinosaurs, not so common. 3) A nearly worldwide phenomena of Eubrontes and Grallator footprints, with few other species, characterize this time period.
|Grallator footprints early Jurassic|
|(c) H. Kyoht Luterman Megapnosaurus|
you should be starting to see the pattern- whenever I have a whole mess of "terrestrial predators" but seemingly very few herbivores- maybe, just maybe, they are exploiting aquatic resources. And this is exactly the conclusion several of the authors reached in the Triassic-Jurassic conference abstracts I mentioned above. Several authors noted that crocs at the time were small little terrestrial buggers, even after they invaded water habitats they remained fairly small until well into the Cretaceous when we get guys like Sarchosuchus battling it out with spinosaurs for top freshwater predator. So they take it one step further, and justifiably so imo, suggesting theropods exploited near shore aquatic niches throughout the Jurassic- culminating in spinosaurids into the Cretaceous. Various other guys, the family Unenlaginnae for example, may have become fish catching specialists as well.
|Austroraptor cabazai family Unenlaginnae|
Because I like lots of pics, here is some art I've done over the years tangentially related to this post:
|Juvenile Allosaurus and adult Ceratosaurus in lungfish dispute. Although he got a lot of heat for it I actually like Bakker's paper on theropod family values- I just disagree to the extent ceratosaurus was a fish eater.|
(c) Duane Nash. 2011
|Dilophosaurus fishing/wading. I remember spilling ink by its feet and trying to make it look like stirred mud. |
(c) Duane Nash. 1998
The Age of Dinosaurs in South America. Fernando E. Novas. 2009
The Triassic/Jurassic Terrestrial Transition Abstracts Volume
Support me on Patreon.
Like antediluvian salad on facebook.
My other blog southlandbeaver.blogspot.